Tussle in Western Asia: Exploring Trivial Geo Political Motives for Palestine Issue

After the truce mediated by Qatar, the world witnessed air strikes across the Gaza strip which killed at most 18,000 innocent people on the “Bushian” term:- anti-terrorism. In the name of ground evasion, hospitals were attacked, and Patients suffered from a lack of medicines and treatments. The strategy accepted by the two sects is more perplexing as both sides are focused on erasing their threat to existence. If one is for killing for one, the other is for defense for one with ten killing tenants instead of thousands may be ethically justifiable, but what about if thousands are slaughtered instead of ten? Justification barely reflects absurdity.

Issue of Palestine:- localization and globalisation

The history of Palestine intermingled with the “justifiable” invasions and “ominous” terror attacks from 1992, the two-state theory was accepted by Israel, but this also caused a division and break of unity among Palestinians which is also a strategic win from the part of Israel. Israel won by parting Palestine's emotions and manipulating one part. Thus gaining a hand over other factions. This strategic plan was in the way of winning, until October 7. PCO, one faction after the Oslo accord, was an obvious puppet from the slaughter of PCO chief Yasir Arafat. Mohammed Fathah, one puppet ruling the West Bank acted as a puppet, for Israeli invasions and slaughter.

On the pax with PCO, Hamas was officially recognized as a terrorist for their passive resistance to survival

The attack on October 7, from the part of Hamas, which killed 1800 civilians and abducted more than 200 civilians, is more than a warning, it is a kind of strategy that confines “normalization policy” from the part of Arab countries.

After 2015, world geopolitics were witnessed in dramas and scripts. The map was changed, and new polar politics emerged west-Asian and Central Asian countries were largely affected by this change. Take over of the Taliban and Russian invasion and the continual of Rageb Tayyib Erdukhan are mere examples.

Apart from these, more transition is seen by the changing attitudes of Arab countries, like Saudi-Arabia, UAE, and Egypt, who were once more proactive against Israel, were normalizing their ties with Israel; it was also condemned in GCC committee summits, but through on evolutionary process, all accepted same routes. However, this normalization was accepted by the global community causing seven blows for the Israeli-Palestine issue.

By the so-called “Normalisation” policy, the Palestine invasion disappeared from the fore-front discussion and was dragged into the local discussion. I don't argue that the “localization of Palestine Issue” was caused by the normalization alone, but the takeover of the Afghan Taliban, Mehta Amini's Death in Iran, the public response against elixirs representative in Iraq, and the Ukraine issue added fuel to the fire, this is why I saying that the sudden transition of geo-; politics between 2014-23 had made Palestine issue trivial. 

This localization made Israel atrocities unseen in forefront media and public outlook by the Oct 7 the breakdown of the system was also acquired. As Hamas aimed, the Palestine issue and Israel atrocities were globally discussed and got media courage. however apart from the globalization of the issue the grave mistakes, Hamas has made is regrettable and condemned by both sides